<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pay to Play? Ann Taylor&#8217;s Blogger Blow-Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mommarkettrends.com/mom-bloggers/pay-to-play-ann-taylors-blogger-blow-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mommarkettrends.com/mom-bloggers/pay-to-play-ann-taylors-blogger-blow-up/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Jan 2012 16:16:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sylvia</title>
		<link>http://mommarkettrends.com/mom-bloggers/pay-to-play-ann-taylors-blogger-blow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-587</link>
		<dc:creator>Sylvia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 00:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mommarkettrends.com/?p=1462#comment-587</guid>
		<description>This whole thing is absurd. While Ann Taylor LOFT&#039;s ploy was really obnoxious, this was because all gift cards were $10 not $10-500 and not a single attendee we know &quot;won&quot; the $500 card (side note to LOFT, writers all know each other and we talk). This wasn&#039;t because it was pay for play. Is the FTC unaware of how many freebies writers (including this editor) get from companies in general? Whether a print journalist like myself or a web blogger, we are showered with stuff. It arrives via courier, we get it in gift bags, you can&#039;t stop the flow. It just is. If my publication spent money to send back every unsolicited gift we received, we&#039;d actually go bankrupt. Do journos from Vogue, Elle and Harper&#039;s and all the mags bypass the goody bag handed out to us at an event? Of course not. Witness last Thursday&#039;s Ann Taylor party at the Ace Hotel. We all (and no, I won&#039;t tell you which one I write for) collected a goody bag on the way out. Lookbook and a pretty necklace. Is that a bribe? Don&#039;t be absurd. No self-respecting journalist (print or web or whatever you want to call bloggers) can be bought off with a $50 necklace, much less a $10 gift card. The fact is, that all this merch allows us to see (and experience) what we are being pitched. We write about things which capture our imagination - and newsflash, FTC, if I&#039;m holding it in my hand, yes, it&#039;s more likely to make sense to me. End stop and out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This whole thing is absurd. While Ann Taylor LOFT&#8217;s ploy was really obnoxious, this was because all gift cards were $10 not $10-500 and not a single attendee we know &#8220;won&#8221; the $500 card (side note to LOFT, writers all know each other and we talk). This wasn&#8217;t because it was pay for play. Is the FTC unaware of how many freebies writers (including this editor) get from companies in general? Whether a print journalist like myself or a web blogger, we are showered with stuff. It arrives via courier, we get it in gift bags, you can&#8217;t stop the flow. It just is. If my publication spent money to send back every unsolicited gift we received, we&#8217;d actually go bankrupt. Do journos from Vogue, Elle and Harper&#8217;s and all the mags bypass the goody bag handed out to us at an event? Of course not. Witness last Thursday&#8217;s Ann Taylor party at the Ace Hotel. We all (and no, I won&#8217;t tell you which one I write for) collected a goody bag on the way out. Lookbook and a pretty necklace. Is that a bribe? Don&#8217;t be absurd. No self-respecting journalist (print or web or whatever you want to call bloggers) can be bought off with a $50 necklace, much less a $10 gift card. The fact is, that all this merch allows us to see (and experience) what we are being pitched. We write about things which capture our imagination &#8211; and newsflash, FTC, if I&#8217;m holding it in my hand, yes, it&#8217;s more likely to make sense to me. End stop and out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stacey @ Tree, Root, and Twig</title>
		<link>http://mommarkettrends.com/mom-bloggers/pay-to-play-ann-taylors-blogger-blow-up/comment-page-1/#comment-453</link>
		<dc:creator>Stacey @ Tree, Root, and Twig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mommarkettrends.com/?p=1462#comment-453</guid>
		<description>There has to be a finer point to this that I am missing, or else why would I be so confused about the &quot;blow up&quot; over this?  I participate in a few momblogger review panels online, and at least two of them offer incentives similar to this.  Here&#039;s the exact text from a recent email (though I omitted the names of the products they were promoting): &lt;i&gt;If selected for this program, you will receive samples of the *** and the *** weeks before they hit the shelves so you can try them out and share your feedback with your readers. After the tour, we will send all participants a $20 gift card as a thank you for posting.&lt;/i&gt;   Another panel I belong to doesn&#039;t reward every post, but does offer those who post a chance to be randomly drawn for one of any number of prizes (including gift cards).  I&#039;ve seen both of these panels applauded for showing support to the momblogging community by offering tangible compensation (beyond simply providing product).

I&#039;m sincere in saying that I&#039;m not sure what the difference is between what LOFT did and what these review panels do.  It seems that LOFT is just following a business model that has already been established by other momblogger marketing/word-of-mouth providers online.

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s fair of the LA Times to suggest that the bigger/better the LOFT coverage, the greater the amount of the gift card - that&#039;s assuming quite a bit.  But I do agree with everyone&#039;s concern over any of the bloggers not disclosing the details of the LOFT event.  Even the two panels I mentioned absolutely insist on transparency.

So my honest question is:  what did LOFT do that others have not already been doing (and with success and some degree of respect) online?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There has to be a finer point to this that I am missing, or else why would I be so confused about the &#8220;blow up&#8221; over this?  I participate in a few momblogger review panels online, and at least two of them offer incentives similar to this.  Here&#8217;s the exact text from a recent email (though I omitted the names of the products they were promoting): <i>If selected for this program, you will receive samples of the *** and the *** weeks before they hit the shelves so you can try them out and share your feedback with your readers. After the tour, we will send all participants a $20 gift card as a thank you for posting.</i>   Another panel I belong to doesn&#8217;t reward every post, but does offer those who post a chance to be randomly drawn for one of any number of prizes (including gift cards).  I&#8217;ve seen both of these panels applauded for showing support to the momblogging community by offering tangible compensation (beyond simply providing product).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sincere in saying that I&#8217;m not sure what the difference is between what LOFT did and what these review panels do.  It seems that LOFT is just following a business model that has already been established by other momblogger marketing/word-of-mouth providers online.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s fair of the LA Times to suggest that the bigger/better the LOFT coverage, the greater the amount of the gift card &#8211; that&#8217;s assuming quite a bit.  But I do agree with everyone&#8217;s concern over any of the bloggers not disclosing the details of the LOFT event.  Even the two panels I mentioned absolutely insist on transparency.</p>
<p>So my honest question is:  what did LOFT do that others have not already been doing (and with success and some degree of respect) online?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

